You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 4, April 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 66TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SURGICAL SOCIETY, DIXVILLE NOTCH, NH, OCT 11-13, 1985
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Continuous Mixed Venous Oximetry in Critically Ill Surgical Patients

'High-Tech' Cost-effectiveness

Rocco Orlando, III, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(4):470-471.


Abstract

• Mixed venous oxygen saturation (Svo2) provides a measure of cardiorespiratory ability to meet the body's needs for oxygen. The Svo2 was measured continuously in 20 critically ill surgical patients using a pulmonary-artery oximetry system. The accuracy of the technique was validated by comparing initial continuous Svo2 to the laboratory determination of Svo2. Oximetry was used to guide therapeutic decisions regarding fluid, inotropic agents, vasodilators and ventilator setting and was useful in ten cases. Sepsis developed in nine patients; this severely limited the usefulness of the technique. With clinical decision making based on oximetry, there was a savings per catheter of 2.65 cardiac output determinations and 5.9 venous blood gas determinations, resulting in a net savings per catheter of $75.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:470-471)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery, Hartford (Conn) Hospital and University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 3, 1986.

Read before the 66th Annual Meeting of the New England Surgical Society, Dixville Notch, NH, Oct 11, 1985.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06115 (Dr Orlando).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit Analyses in the Medical Literature: Are the Methods Being Used Correctly?
Udvarhelyi et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1992;116:238-244.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.