 |
 |

The Impact of Prospective Reimbursement on Trauma CentersAn Alternative Payment Plan
Lenworth M. Jacobs, MD, MPH;
Robert J. Schwartz, MD
Arch Surg. 1986;121(4):479-483.
Abstract
 |  |
We studied 1,526 patients entered into the Trauma Registry by demographic, physiologic, anatomic, investigational, and clinical data. Severely injured patients consumed more resources, had longer hospital stays, and were prospectively reimbursed less than the cost of their hospitalization. Age was not related to severity of injury or cost. The hospital was reimbursed approximately $12,000 less per patient than the cost. A financial projection of reimbursement of trauma patients compared with that of all inpatients revealed that trauma patients were reimbursed less than all patients combined (reimbursement, 77% vs 93%, respectively). Updated reimbursement weighting codes for 1985 increased the losses to the hospital. Trauma patients were reimbursed for 56% of their total bill, a financial loss of $1,800 per patient, and all inpatients were reimbursed 80%, a financial loss of $507 per patient. We suggest an alternative reimbursement system, based on voluntary national norms, objective national outcome criteria, and appropriate trauma management.
(Arch Surg 1986;121:479-483)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Surgery and the Trauma Program, Hartford (Conn) Hospital.
Footnotes
Accepted for publication Jan 3, 1986.
Read before the 66th Annual Meeting of the New England Surgical Society, Dixville Notch, NH, Oct 12, 1985.
Reprint requests to the Trauma Program, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06115 (Dr Jacobs).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Why Surgeons Prefer Not to Care for Trauma Patients
Esposito et al.
Arch Surg 1991;126:292-297.
ABSTRACT
The Misconception of Trauma Reimbursement
Shapiro et al.
Arch Surg 1989;124:1237-1240.
ABSTRACT
Predicting Hospital Charges for Trauma Care
Pories et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:579-582.
ABSTRACT
|