You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 6, June 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 93RD ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, ROCHESTER, MINN, NOV 17-20, 1985-PART 2
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Closure of Abdominal Incisions With Subcutaneous Catheters

A Prospective Randomized Trial

Michael B. Farnell, MD; Susan Worthington-Self, RN; Peter Mucha, Jr, MD; Duane M. Ilstrup, MS; Donald C. McIlrath, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(6):641-648.


Abstract

• A preliminary report from our institution suggested that closure of abdominal incisions with subcutaneous, closed-suction catheters intermittently irrigated with antibiotic resulted in decreased wound infection rates. To test this hypothesis, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial was undertaken to compare the results of primary closure, subcutaneous catheter irrigated with saline or antibiotic, and subcutaneous catheter alone. During the two-year trial, 3,282 incisions (type II, III, or IV) were analyzed. Subcutaneous catheter placement alone or with antibiotic or saline irrigation was not superior to primary closure for type II or III incisions. A trend favoring subcutaneous catheter and antibiotic irrigation was observed for type IV incisions. This finding suggests that further clinical trials designed to assess the role of subcutaneous catheter placement and antibiotic irrigation in decreasing wound infection rates are warranted in type IV incisions.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:641-648)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Farnell, Mucha, and McIlrath and Ms Worthington-Self) and Medical Statistics and Epidemiology (Mr Ilstrup), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 4, 1986.

Read before the 93rd Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Rochester, Minn, Nov 19, 1985.

Reprint requests to Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (Dr Farnell).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Continuous, 10-Year Wound Infection Surveillance: Results, Advantages, and Unanswered Questions
Olson and Lee
Arch Surg 1990;125:794-803.
ABSTRACT  

A New Bowel Preparation for Elective Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
Wolff et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:895-900.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.