This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (84)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Efficacy of Streptokinase vs Urokinase

Michael Belkin, MD; Barbara Belkin, MD; Charles A. Bucknam, MD; J. John Straub, MD; Robert Lowe, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(7):769-773.

Abstract
• This study is a retrospective comparison of the results in 25 low-dose, intra-arterial streptokinase and 12 low-dose intra-arterial urokinase infusions for thromboembolic disease. Intra-arterial streptokinase was successful in 50% of infusions and was marked by significant abnormalities in the coagulation criteria. There was a high incidence of major and minor bleeding (48% overall), which could be attributed to systemic effects of the drug. Urokinase was successful in 100% of infusions, and showed no significant effects on systemic coagulation criteria. There were also fewer complications during urokinase infusion. The average pharmacy cost for a course of intra-arterial streptokinase was $165, while urokinase cost $1142. Despite the significant difference in expense, the increased efficacy and safety of urokinase make it the preferred agent for intra-arterial infusion. Theoretical reasons for the increased effectiveness of urokinase are discussed.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:769-773)

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Surgery (Drs M. Belkin, Bucknam, and Lowe) and Radiology (Drs B. Belkin and Straub), Hartford (Conn) Hospital.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Nov 12, 1985.

Read before the 66th Annual Meeting of the New England Surgical Society, Dixville Notch, NH, Oct 11, 1985.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06115-0729 (Dr M. Belkin).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Thrombolytic Therapy
Baker
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOST 2002;8:291-314.
 

Long-Term Results After Percutaneous Low-Dose Streptokinase Treatment for Acute Arterial Thrombosis
Yilmaz et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2000;34:225-230.
ABSTRACT  

Long-Term Results of Local Thrombolysis Followed by First Rib Resection: An Encouraging Clinical Experience in Treatment of Subclavian Vein Thrombosis
Yilmaz et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2000;34:17-22.
ABSTRACT  

Effect on Thrombolysis and its Complication of Graft Occlusion and Specific Risk Factors
Ikeda et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1995;29:443-448.
ABSTRACT  

Regional Thrombolysis for Peripheral Arterial Occlusions: Initial Procedure of Choice?: Case Reports
Anker et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:701-708.
ABSTRACT  

Intracranial Hemorrhage as the Synergistic Effect of Urokinase and Renal Dysfunction--A Case Report
Wyble et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:395-399.
ABSTRACT  

Combined Effects of Urokinase and Heparin on PTT Values During Thrombolytic Therapy
Sheiman and Phillips
ANGIOLOGY 1993;44:114-122.
ABSTRACT  

Response to Krzywda and Colleagues
Haire
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1992;16:596-597.
 

Current Therapy of Peripheral Obstructive Arterial Disease. The Non-Surgical Approach
De Felice et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1990;41:1-11.
ABSTRACT  

Left Ventricular Thromboembolic Occlusion of the Popliteal Artery Treated Nonoperatively with Local Urokinase Infusion A Case Report
Weisman et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1988;39:179-186.
ABSTRACT