You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 7, July 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Aseptic Hip Necrosis After Renal Transplantation

Maria Brazil, MD; Robin J. Linderer, RN; Maureen J. Dickhans, RN; Paul J. Garvin, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(7):803-805.


Abstract

• To help determine the etiology of posttransplant aseptic hip necrosis, 11 stable renal allograft recipients (group A) who developed aseptic hip necrosis were compared with 89 patients (group B) without this complication. A comparison of mean age, duration of dialysis, mean daily prednisone dose, and incidence of rejection in the first year following transplant, sex, donor source, incidence of posttransplant parathyroidectomy, and mean serum calcium and alkaline phosphatase levels identified no significant differences between groups A and B. The mean serum creatinine value at three (2.2± 0.31 mg/dL [190±30 µmol/L] vs 1.9±0.10 mg/dL [170±10 µmol/L]) and 12 (2.3±0.35 mg/dL [200±30 µmol/L] vs 1.9±0.10 mg/dL [170±10 µmol/L]) months and the serum phosphate value at three (3.0±0.19 mg/dL [0.97±0.06 mmol/L] vs 2.8±0.08 mg/dL [0.90±0.03 mmol/L]) and six (3.2±0.25 mg/dL [1.03±0.08 mmol/L] vs 2.9± 0.25 mg/dL [0.94± 0.08 mmol/L]) months were significantly greater in group A. Eight patients in group A underwent 13 total hip replacements an average of 16.5±3.1 months following transplant without significant complications. In conclusion, posttransplant aseptic hip necrosis occurs frequently, and renal allograft dysfunction may contribute significantly to its pathogenesis. When indicated, total hip replacement is both safe and effective.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:803-805)



Author Affiliations

From the Transplant Unit, John Cochran Veterans Administration Medical Center, St Louis (Dr Garvin), and the Department of Surgery, St Louis University (Drs Brazil and Garvin and Mss Linderer and Dickhans).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 25, 1985.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, 1325 S Grand Blvd, St Louis, MO 63104 (Dr Garvin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Infection around Joint Replacements in Patients Who Have a Renal or Liver Transplantation
TANNENBAUM et al.
JBJS 1997;79:36-43.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.