This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Jeremiah O. Young, MD; Norman L. Sadowsky, MD; John W. Young; Leon Herman, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(7):807-809.

Abstract
• We analyzed 342 women who had suspicious breast lumps to determine if preoperative mammography could improve the malignancy yield of biopsy procedures. The number of women with cancer of the breast and false-negative mammogram reports ranged from 11% to 25%, depending on how equivocal mammogram reports were interpreted. Therefore, women with clinically suspicious breast lumps should undergo biopsy regardless of mammographic findings. A significant difference in the mean (±SD) predictive value of a positive mammogram existed between women above and below the age of 50 years (80±8 vs 43±14) because of the age-specific relative prevalence of benign and malignant disease, and because mammography had difficulty distinguishing between benign and malignant lumps (specificity, 70). Preoperative mammography of women with suspicious breast lumps is indicated to screen for occult carcinoma, to prevent biopsy sampling errors, and to judge the adequacy of lumpectomy if the lesion is malignant.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:807-809)

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Surgery (Dr Young) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr Herman), Framingham Union Hospital, Framingham, Mass, and Boston University; Departments of Radiology, Faulkner Hospital, Jamaica Plain, Mass, and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston (Dr Sadowsky); and Yale University, New Haven, Conn (Mr Young).

Footnotes
Accepted for publication Oct 8, 1985.

Reprint requests to Lincoln Medical Center, Framingham, MA 01701 (Dr Young).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?