You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 7, July 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (34)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Antacid vs Sucralfate in Preventing Acute Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding in Abdominal Aortic Surgery

A Randomized Trial in 50 Patients

Edgar Borrero, MD; Joy Ciervo, RN; John B. Chang, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(7):810-812.


Abstract

• We carried out a randomized, controlled trial of sucralfate vs antacid as prophylaxis against upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in 50 patients who had undergone abdominal aortic surgery. The groups were similar in age, sex, duration of prophylaxis, and number of risk factors per patient. No patient in the antacid group had upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding. One patient in the sucralfate group had frank bleeding from the nasogastric tube; however, she also had a coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia. The bleeding stopped when these conditions were corrected. No complications occurred in the sucralfate group; five patients in the antacid group had minor complications. Sucralfate was as effective as antacid in this trial, and it resulted in a considerable saving in nursing time.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:810-812)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery (Drs Borrero and Chang), and the Intensive Care Unit (Ms Ciervo), Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY; and State University of New York at Stony Brook (Drs Borrero and Chang).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Oct 8, 1985.

Reprint requests to Division of Vascular Surgery, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY 11042 (Dr Chang).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effects of Sucralfate vs Antacids on Gastric Pathogens: Results of a Double-blind Clinical Trial
Ephgrave et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:251-257.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Critically III Patients: Resolving Discordant Meta-analyses
Cook et al.
JAMA 1996;275:308-314.
ABSTRACT  

Risk Factors for Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Critically Ill Patients
Cook et al.
NEJM 1994;330:377-381.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Patients With Ulcers
Itokazu and Danziger
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 1989;2:382-392.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.