You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 8, August 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (81)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Improving Results of Cholecystectomy

Jack Pickleman, MD; Richard P. González

Arch Surg. 1986;121(8):930-934.


Abstract

• We reviewed the outcome of 389 consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy during the ten-year period from 1973 to 1983. Significant discrepancies between this series and other published data were noted as follows: (1) Patients with acute cholecystitis, although older, had comparable morbidity and mortality rates with patients undergoing elective cholecystectomy. (2) Diabetic and nondiabetic patients with acute cholecystitis had similar outcomes. (3) In those patients with acute cholecystitis, delay in operation after hospital admission did not increase operative technical difficulties, morbidity, or length of postoperative hospitalization, although total hospitalization was prolonged. (4) The histologic reports of gallbladder pathology in those patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis did not disclose acute inflammatory changes in 39% of cases, raising questions about the validity of previous reviews of patients with acute cholecystitis in which the microscopic diagnosis alone was used.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:930-934)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 20, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S First Ave, Maywood, IL 60153 (Dr Pickleman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Complications of Laparoscopic Surgery-Cholecystectomy
Rhodes
SURG INNOV 1997;4:147-153.
ABSTRACT  

Laparoscopic Bile Duct Injuries Risk Factors, Recognition, and Repair
Rossi et al.
Arch Surg 1992;127:596-602.
ABSTRACT  

Twelve Hundred Open Cholecystectomies Before the Laparoscopic Era: A Standard for Comparison
Morgenstern et al.
Arch Surg 1992;127:400-403.
ABSTRACT  

Endoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Analysis of Complications
Wolfe et al.
Arch Surg 1991;126:1192-1198.
ABSTRACT  

Gallstone Lithotripsy vs Cholecystectomy: A Preliminary Cost-benefit Analysis
Rothschild et al.
Arch Surg 1990;125:710-714.
ABSTRACT  

Management of Asymptomatic Gallstones in the Diabetic Patient: A Decision Analysis
Friedman et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1988;109:913-919.
ABSTRACT  

The Vanishing Elective Cholecystectomy: Trends and Their Consequences
Diettrich et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:810-814.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.