You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 8, August 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL NOTES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (85)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Use of an Absorbable Mesh to Repair Contaminated Abdominal-Wall Defects

Merril T. Dayton, MD; Brentley A. Buchele, MD; Siroos S. Shirazi, MD; Lyle B. Hunt, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(8):954-960.


Abstract

• When polypropylene mesh (Marlex) is used to repair contaminated abdominal-wall hernias, a high incidence of mesh-related chronic infection, drainage, erosion, and bleeding is noted. As an alternative to placing polypropylene mesh in a contaminated field, in the past 18 months we have used an absorbable polyglycolic acid mesh (Dexon) to repair contaminated abdominal-wall defects in eight patients—three with necrotizing abdominal-wall infections, one with an extensive electrical burn of the abdominal wall, three with infected polypropylene mesh from a previous repair, and one whose hernia was covered by a chronically infected scar. In seven of the eight cases, a single sheet of polyglycolic acid mesh was sewn to the fascial margins. In four cases, skin was closed over the mesh; wound packing and subsequent skin grafting were required in the other four. In follow-up studies that ranged from three to 18 months, six of the eight patients developed abdominal-wall hernias at the site of absorbable mesh placement. None of the patients required an abdominal binder. Postoperative hernia development is probable in patients whose defects are repaired with absorbable mesh. However, this complication is balanced against the more serious complications of fistula, bleeding, skin erosion, drainage, and chronic infection, which require removal of the more rigid nonabsorbable meshes in 50% to 90% of cases when the latter are placed under contaminated conditions. Placement of absorbable mesh for temporary abdominal-wall support until wound contamination resolves enhances the likelihood of subsequent successful placement of a permanent mesh.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:954-960)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 25, 1985; revised Nov 5, 1985.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242 (Dr Dayton).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Are Biologic Grafts Effective for Hernia Repair?: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Hiles et al.
SURG INNOV 2009;16:26-37.
ABSTRACT  

Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair in Obese Patients: A New Standard of Care
Novitsky et al.
Arch Surg 2006;141:57-61.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Short-term Outcomes With Small Intestinal Submucosa for Ventral Abdominal Hernia
Helton et al.
Arch Surg 2005;140:549-562.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Technology of Prosthetic Material
Gadacz et al.
SURG INNOV 1994;1:123-127.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.