You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 9, September 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

An 11-Year Experience With Deep Leg Veins as Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafts

Martin L. Schulman, MD; Mohan Rao Badhey, MD; Ruben Yatco, MD; George Pillari, MD

Arch Surg. 1986;121(9):1010-1015.


Abstract

• Since 1974, 82 primary femoropopliteal bypasses were performed using superficial femoral, popliteal, and deep femoral veins exclusively. Saphenous nonavailability dictated usage in 20 cases, and 62 grafts were placed as part of a randomized comparative study with saphenous veins. Cumulative life table patency rates at 1, 2, 3,4, and 5 years were 89%, 87%, 70%, 60%, and 60%. Surgical indications were critical ischemia (n = 77) and claudication (n = 5). Late stasis changes and ulceration did not occur and six-month ankle swellings were only 0.58 cm greater than in patients with saphenous vein grafts. Routine periodic postoperative angiography (256 studies in 74 patients) allowed informed evaluation of most late graft failures. Occlusions in the first two years, which were mainly associated with advanced distal disease, were predominantly not graft related. Most later occlusions were intrinsic; they were caused by distal anastomotic hyperplasia or, in those patients with the largest grafts, the embolization of graft mural thrombi. Revised anastomotic technique and rejection of the largest grafts may ameliorate these problems.

(Arch Surg 1986;121:1010-1015)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Schulman and Badhey) and Radiology (Dr Pillari), State University of New York at Stony Brook; and Deepdale General Hospital, Little Neck, NY (Drs Schulman, Badhey, and Yatco).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 14, 1985.

Reprint requests to 29 Barstow Rd, Great Neck, NY 11021 (Dr Schulman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use of the Superficial Femoral-Popliteal Vein to Salvage Dialysis Access: A Case Report
Lee et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2000;34:531-535.
ABSTRACT  

Subclavian Artery Bypass Using Superficial Femoral Vein. A Case Report
Simsir et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1997;31:601-604.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Arterial Insufficiency of the Lower Extremities: A Critical Review
Weitz et al.
Circulation 1996;94:3026-3049.
FULL TEXT  

Unusual Autogenous Vein Grafts
Schulman et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1992;26:257-264.
ABSTRACT  

Distal Anastomotic Hyperplasia in Superficial Femoral-Popliteal Vein Femoropopliteal Bypass Grafts
Schulman et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1991;25:618-627.
ABSTRACT  

Reversed vs. In Situ: Is Either the Technique of Choice for Lower Extremity Vein Bypass?
Taylor and Porter
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1988;1:35-55.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.