You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 9, September 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Axillofemoral bypass. Expectations and results

R. A. Savrin, G. T. Record and D. E. McDowell

We studied 33 patients who received axillofemorofemoral or axillofemoral polytef (polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE]) grafts. The follow-up period ranged from six to 60 months. Most patients were operated on for limb salvage. The 30-day operative mortality was 7% for elective or urgent procedures and 67% for emergency procedures. Twelve amputations were performed, but nine were necessitated by preexisting tissue loss and three were performed below rather than above the knee following proximal revascularization. Cumulative graft patency was 91% at three years and 75% at five years. Patient survival was only 54% at three years and 41% at five years. Graft patency exceeded patient survival at every interval. In a select group of high-risk patients requiring proximal revascularization for limb salvage, axillofemorofemoral bypass offers an acceptable alternative to an in situ aortofemoral graft.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A Twenty-Year Experience with Axillofemoral Bypass: Analysis of 63 Consecutive Cases
Mingoli et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1991;25:677-688.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.