You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 1, January 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 6TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SURGICAL INFECTION SOCIETY, CHICAGO, APRIL 21-22, 1986-PART I
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (28)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparison of Quantitative Microbiology and Histopathology in Divided Burn-Wound Biopsy Specimens

Albert T. McManus, PhD; Seung H. Kim, MD; William F. McManus, MD; Arthur D. Mason, Jr, MD; Basil A. Pruitt, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 1987;122(1):74-76.


Abstract

• We examined the association between quantitative microbiologic results and histopathologic findings in divided biopsy specimens from 200 burned patients. Microbiologic counts were determined as log10 colony-forming units per gram of disrupted tissue. Histopathologic results were scored on a scale of 1 to 6, values of 4 or greater indicating microbial invasion of viable tissue. Agreement of 96.1% was found between negative cultures, arbitrarily identified as those with fewer than 5 logs/g, and histologic absence of invasive infection. In sharp contrast, however, histologic invasion occurred in only 36% of specimens with positive cultures. Though low tissue counts are essentially synonymous with negative histologic findings, quantitative microbiology is not a diagnostic substitute for histologic examination, since high tissue counts quite commonly do not indicate invasion. The principal value of quantitative burn-wound biopsies is the demonstration of predominant burn-wound flora.

(Arch Surg 1987;122:74-76)



Author Affiliations

From the US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, Tex.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 24, 1986.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

Read before the Sixth Annual Meeting of the Surgical Infection Society, Chicago, April 21, 1986.

Reprint requests to Library, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234-6200.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Burn Wound Infections
Church et al.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006;19:403-434.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sepsis and Survival in Burn Patients
Pruitt
J Intensive Care Med 1987;2:294-296.
 

Burn Wound Sepsis
Hansbrough
J Intensive Care Med 1987;2:313-327.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.