You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 10, October 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Incidence and Mechanism of Post—Carotid Endarterectomy Hypertension

James L. Skydell, MD; Herbert I. Machleder, MD; J. Dennis Baker, MD; Ronald W. Busuttil, MD; Wesley S. Moore, MD

Arch Surg. 1987;122(10):1153-1155.


Abstract

• Hypertension following carotid endarterectomy occurs frequently but is poorly understood. Its occurrence has been correlated with an increased incidence of neurologic complication. We identified those factors that correlate with an increased incidence of post—carotid endarterectomy hypertension. The records of 100 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy at UCLA Medical Center from November 1981 to September 1983 were examined. One hundred fifty variables were surveyed to determine those factors associated with this problem. Fifty-eight percent of the study patients developed post—carotid endarterectomy hypertension (an increase in systolic blood pressure greater than 35 mm Hg over baseline, and/or blood pressure requiring treatment with sodium nitroprusside). Of patients who developed this problem, 93% had diabetes mellitus, 75% received isoflurane anesthesia, 71% had peripheral vascular occlusive disease, 71% underwent ipsilateral transient ischemic attacks, and 65% had high-grade ipsilateral carotid stenosis. These variables have in common the loss of or interference with cerebral autoregulation. Central dysautoregulation may set the stage for a positive feedback mechanism that results in increased blood pressure. Anesthetic agents that do not interfere with cerebral auto-regulation may reduce the incidence of this complication, and an aggressive treatment program may prevent neurologic complications.

(Arch Surg 1987;122:1153-1155)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, UCLA Medical Center.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 30, 1986.

Reprint requests to UCLA Medical Center, Department of Vascular Surgery, Los Angeles, CA 90024 (Dr Moore).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Arterial pressure management and carotid endarterectomy
Stoneham and Thompson
Br J Anaesth 2009;102:442-452.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pharmacological Review of Postoperative Hypertension
Lewis
Journal of Pharmacy Practice 2002;15:135-146.
ABSTRACT  

Cardiovascular, autonomic, and plasma catecholamine responses in unilateral and bilateral carotid artery stenosis
Akinola et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1999;67:428-432.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk-Benefit Aspects of Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis
Colburn and Moore
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1994;7:6-30.
 

Results of Staged Bilateral Carotid Endarterectomy
Maxwell et al.
Arch Surg 1992;127:793-799.
ABSTRACT  

Seizures Following Carotid Endarterectomy
Kieburtz et al.
Arch Neurol 1990;47:568-570.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.