You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 10, October 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Techniques of Liver Resection

Comparison of Suction Knife, Ultrasonic Dissector, and Contact Neodymium-YAG Laser

Tom Schröder, MD; P.-O. Hasselgren, MD; Kim Brackett, PhD; Stephen N. Joffe, MD

Arch Surg. 1987;122(10):1166-1171.


Abstract

• Liver resections were performed in 18 pigs with an inexpensive disposable plastic suction knife, an ultrasonic dissector, or a contact neodymium (Nd)–YAG laser. Technical aspects and intraoperative and postoperative data were compared. Intraoperative blood loss was less with the suction knife (112±28 mL) than with the ultrasonic dissector (149±45 mL) or Nd-YAG laser (174±25 mL). Operating time was similar in all groups. The number of ligatures used in the Nd-YAG laser group (12±1) was significantly less than in the ultrasonic dissector (27±2) or suction knife (32±2) groups. In the ultrasonic dissector group, there was an increase in postoperative white blood cell count and liver enzyme levels compared with the other two groups. Light microscopy revealed dilated bile ducts in the ultrasonic dissector resection group, which may reflect biliary stasis. There were no significant differences in mortality among the three experimental groups. Results indicated that the ultrasonic dissector and the contact laser method were not substantially better than an inexpensive, easily modified plastic suction catheter in performing a major nonanatomic liver resection in piglets.

(Arch Surg 1987;122:1166-1171)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 30, 1986.

Reprint requests to IV Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki, Kasarminkatu 11-13, 00130 Helsinki, Finland (Dr Schröder).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.