You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 12, December 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, LONDON, APRIL 27 TO APRIL 30, 1987-PART II
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (151)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Colorectal Cancer

Dukes' Stage, Tumor Site, Preoperative Plasma CEA Level, and Patient Prognosis Related to Tumor DNA Ploidy Pattern

Nigel A. Scott, MB; Harry S. Wieand, PhD; Charles G. Moertel, MD; Stephen S. Cha, MS; Robert W. Beart, MD; Michael M. Lieber, MD

Arch Surg. 1987;122(12):1375-1379.


Abstract

• Flow cytometric DNA histograms of colorectal carcinomas from 264 patients were evaluated for the association of tumor site, Dukes' stage, tumor grade, and preoperative carcinoembryonic level with patient survival. The DNA nondiploid carcinomas were significantly more common from the left (descending and sigmoid) colon and the rectum. A poorer prognosis was found for patients with DNA nondiploid cancers than for patients with DNA diploid cancers. This was particularly true for patients with Dukes' stages B2 and C tumors with a small number (one to three) of lymph nodes with metastatic deposits. The DNA nondiploid cancers also had a relatively poorer prognosis in patients with unresectable disease. In a Cox multivariate analysis model, the DNA pattern was an independent prognostic variable for this group of 264 patients with resected colorectal carcinoma.

(Arch Surg 1987;122:1375-1379)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery (Drs Scott and Beart), and Departments of Urology (Dr Lieber), Medical Oncology (Dr Moertel and Mr Cha), and Epidemiology (Dr Wieand and Mr Cha), Mayo Clinic/Foundation, Rochester, Minn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 10, 1987.

Read before the Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, London, April 29, 1987.

Reprint requests to Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic/Foundation, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (Dr Lieber).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

DNA Image Cytometry Predicts Disease Outcome in Stage II Colorectal Carcinoma
BUHMEIDA et al.
Anticancer Res 2009;29:99-106.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Association between chromosomal instability and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
Walther et al.
Gut 2008;57:941-950.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ploidy as a Prognostic Feature in Colonic Adenocarcinoma
Takanishi et al.
Arch Surg 1996;131:587-592.
ABSTRACT  

Prognostic Significance of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Colorectal Carcinoma: Serum Levels Before and After Resection and Before Recurrence
Chu et al.
Arch Surg 1991;126:314-316.
ABSTRACT  

Colorectal Cancer: Evidence for Distinct Genetic Categories Based on Proximal or Distal Tumor Location
Bufill
ANN INTERN MED 1990;113:779-788.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.