You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 5, May 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 94TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, DEARBORN, MICH, NOV 16-19, 1986-Part I
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (43)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Mandatory vs Selective Exploration for Penetrating Neck Trauma

A Prospective Assessment

Joseph P. Meyer, MD; John A. Barrett, MD; James J. Schuler, MD; D. Preston Flanigan, MD

Arch Surg. 1987;122(5):592-597.


Abstract

• To determine the optimal management of patients with penetrating wounds to zone II of the neck, we performed a prospective evaluation of 120 consecutive patients with such injuries, correlating the results of clinical and diagnostic examinations with operative findings. Seven patients presenting with life-threatening hemorrhage from the neck wound were operated on immediately; the remaining 113 patients underwent arterlography, laryngotracheoscopy, esophagoscopy, and esophagography, followed by neck exploration. Forty-eight major injuries were identified in 35 neck explorations. Five patients were identified with clinical and diagnostic findings that were considered normal preoperatively; however, at operation six major injuries were found in these patients. This study indicates that potentially lethal injuries to major vascular and visceral structures in the neck may go undetected if selective exploration criteria are used in the decision to explore penetrating wounds to zone II of the neck.

(Arch Surg 1987;122:592-597)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Vascular Surgery, Cook County Hospital and University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago (Drs Meyer, Schuler, and Flanigan); and Division of Trauma Surgery, Cook County Hospital, Chicago (Dr Barrett).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 13, 1987.

Read before the 94th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Dearborn, Mich, Nov 19, 1986.

Reprint requests to Division of Vascular Surgery, m/c 957, University of Illinois College of Medicine, Suite 2200,1740 W Taylor St, Chicago, IL 60612 (Dr Meyer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Torso Vascular Trauma at an Urban Level I Trauma Center
Goaley et al.
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 2006;18:102-112.
ABSTRACT  

Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Penetrating Neck Trauma: A Preliminary Study
Gracias et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:1231-1235.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Penetrating Injuries of the Neck in Patients in Stable Condition: Physical Examination, Angiography, or Color Flow Doppler Imaging
Demetriades et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:971-975.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.