You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 5, May 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 94TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, DEARBORN, MICH, NOV 16-19, 1986-Part I
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnostic Pericardial Window

A Safe Alternative to Exploratory Thoracotomy for Suspected Heart Injuries

Frank B. Miller, MD; Sheldon J. Bond, MD; Charles R. Shumate, MD; Hiram C. Polk, Jr, MD; J. David Richardson, MD

Arch Surg. 1987;122(5):605-609.


Abstract



• During a five-year period, 104 patients underwent a pericardial window procedure to diagnose possible cardiac injury. Eighty-eight procedures were performed by a subxiphoid approach, and 16 were transdiaphragmatic in combination with an exploratory laparotomy. There were 51 patients with stab wounds, 45 with gunshot wounds, and eight with blunt trauma. All penetrating wounds were near the heart. In seven patients the window disclosed cardiac damage with no clinical signs of tamponade or shock. Fifty-one patients had signs of tamponade; however, only 12 of them had a cardiac injury diagnosed by pericardial window. Nineteen patients had cardiac injuries. One examination had false-negative results and one study had false-positive results. Cardiac wounds repaired included the right ventricle (eight), left ventricle (three), right atrium (five), and cardiac vein or pericardial wounds (three). Complications were negligible and consisted of minor wound infections (two) and postpericardiotomy syndromes (two). The pericardial window provides a rapid and safe means of diagnosing cardiac injuries in patients with equivocal signs of heart injury while sparing the patient without a heart wound a major operation.

(Arch Surg 1987;122:605-609)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Jan 16, 1987.

Read before the 94th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Dearborn, Mich, Nov 19, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 (Dr Miller).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Emergency operation for penetrating thoracic trauma in a metropolitan surgical service in South Africa
Clarke et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2011;142:563-568.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Subxiphoid pericardial window in the diagnosis of penetrating cardiac trauma
Andrade-Alegre and Mon
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1994;58:1139-1141.
ABSTRACT  

Subxiphoid Pericardial Window and Penetrating Cardiac Trauma
Brewster et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:937-941.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.