You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 6, June 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 94TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, DEARBORN, MICH, NOV 16-19, 1986-Part II
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cutaneous Thick Melanoma

Prognosis and Treatment

Shlomo Schneebaum, MD; Henry A. Briele, MD; Michael J. Walker, MD; John Greager, MD; Donald K. Wood, MD; Salve G. Ronan, MD; Minu K. Patel, MS; Tapas K. Das Gupta, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1987;122(6):707-711.


Abstract



• Among proponents of elective lymph node dissection (ELND) for clinical stage I melanoma, controversy exists as to whether there is an upper limit of tumor thickness beyond which ELND should not be considered. We reviewed 169 patients with clinical stage I and II melanoma that was greater than or equal to 3.0 mm thick and who were treated at the University of Illinois Hospital, Chicago. Of 139 patients with clinical stage I disease, 117 underwent ELND. Five- and ten-year survival rates were 55.7% and 48.9%, respectively. Multifactorial analysis demonstrated that anatomical location, level, pathologic stage, and ulceration were the best predictors of survival. Thickness did not emerge as a significant variable. Our findings do not support basing treatment decisions, eg, ELND in this group of patients, solely on the thickness of the primary tumor. We continue to recommend ELND in patients with either intermediate or thick melanomas.

(Arch Surg 1987;122:707-711)



Author Affiliations



From the Division of Surgical Oncology, Departments of Surgery (Drs Schneebaum, Briele, Walker, Greager, Wood, and Das Gupta) and Pathology (Dr Ronan), and the Section of Biometry, Research Resources Center (Mr Patel), University of Illinois at Chicago and Cook County Hospital; the Hektoen Institute for Medical Research (Drs Schneebaum, Briele, Walker, Greager, Wood, and Das Gupta); and the West Side Veterans Administration Hospital (Drs Schneebaum, Briele, Walker, Greager, Wood, and Das Gupta), Chicago.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication April 17, 1987.

Read before the 94th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, Dearborn, Mich, Nov 17, 1986.

Reprint requests to Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 S Wood St, Chicago, IL 60612 (Dr Briele).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Clinical Node-Negative Thick Melanoma
Salti et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:291-295.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognosis of Thick Cutaneous Melanoma of the Trunk and Extremity
Coit et al.
Arch Surg 1990;125:322-326.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.