You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 7, July 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Asymptomatic Carotid Lesions After Endarterectomy of Contralateral Carotid Artery

Five-Year Follow-up Study and Prognosis

Torben Schroeder, MD; Ulf J. V. Helgstrand, MD, PhD; Marianne R. Egeblad, MD; Hans C. Engell, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1987;122(7):795-801.


Abstract

• Of 185 patients who consecutively underwent carotid endarterectomy five years ago, 135 had a patent asymptomatic contralateral internal carotid artery (ICA). During follow-up (median, 59 months), 36 patients developed new neurologic symptoms (18 strokes and 18 transient ischemic attacks). Thirteen patients developed symptoms referable to the territory of the previously asymptomatic ICA (five strokes and eight transient ischemic attacks). Using life-table analysis, the annual stroke rate was estimated to be 1% and 2.2% considering the previously asymptomatic and symptomatic ICA, respectively. Separating patients according to the degree of stenosis on the preoperative angiogram and according to the presence of ulceration revealed a significantly higher incidence of neurologic events and strokes in patients with stenoses exceeding 50% and/or patients with obvious ulcerations. Although the risk of stroke without warning was increased in these subgroups, we did not consider the risk high enough to warrant prophylactic endarterectomy. An exception may be the patient with a more than 90% stenosis.

(Arch Surg 1987;122:795-801)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery D, Division of Vascular Surgery (Drs Schroeder, Helgstrand, and Engell), and the Department of Radiology, Cardiovascular Division (Dr Egeblad), Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 18, 1986.

Read before the Second International Vascular Symposium, London, Sept 11, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Vascular Surgery D 2111, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK 2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark (Dr Schroeder).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medical (Nonsurgical) Intervention Alone Is Now Best for Prevention of Stroke Associated With Asymptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis: Results of a Systematic Review and Analysis
Abbott
Stroke 2009;40:e573-e583.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcome of the Contralateral Carotid Artery in Patients Having Undergone Ipsilateral Carotid Endarterectomy: Results of Selective Management
Eklof et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1998;32:221-232.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.