You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 8, August 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 13TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SOCIETY FOR VASCULAR SURGERY DIXVILLE NOTCH, NH, SEPT 25 TO SEPT 26, 1986
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Management of Early In Situ Saphenous Vein Bypass Occlusions

Norman A. Shoenfeld, MD; Thomas F. O'Donnell, MD; Harry L. Bush, Jr, MD; William C. Mackey, MD; Allan D. Callow, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1987;122(8):871-875.


Abstract

• To determine the causes and optimum management of early in situ bypass occlusions, we reviewed our experience of 13 thromboses occurring within the first 30 postoperative days in 148 in situ saphenous vein reconstructions. All early thrombosed bypasses were performed for limb salvage, with 31% of bypasses to the popliteal level and 69% to infrapopliteal vessels. The median time to occlusion was 24 hours. All patients underwent reoperation. Graft failure was due to retained venous valves in 31% of the procedures, other technical problems in 38%, and inadequate outflow in 31%. Reoperative surgery was individualized. In grafts explored for thrombosis, the one-year graft patency rate was 46%, and the limb salvage rate was 54%. Graft patency did not appear to correlate with the presumed cause of Initial graft occlusion. Our results indicate that an aggressive surgical approach is appropriate in early in situ graft thrombosis.

(Arch Surg 1987;122:871-875)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, New England Medical Center, Boston (Drs Shoenfeld, O'Donnell, Bush, Mackey, and Callow); Boston Veterans Administration Medical Center (Dr Bush); and Tufts University School of Medicine (Drs Shoenfeld, O'Donnell, Bush, Mackey, and Callow), Boston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 12, 1987.

Read before the 13th Annual Meeting of the New England Society for Vascular Surgery, Dixville Notch, NH, Sept 25, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Box 259, New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111 (Dr O'Donnell).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reversed vs. In Situ: Is Either the Technique of Choice for Lower Extremity Vein Bypass?
Taylor and Porter
PERSPECT VASC SURG ENDOVASC THER 1988;1:35-55.
 





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.