You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 9, September 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Treatment of Generalized Peritonitis by Closed Postoperative Peritoneal Lavage

A Critical Review of the Literature

Arnold R. Leiboff, MD; Harry S. Soroff, MD

Arch Surg. 1987;122(9):1005-1010.


Abstract

• Thirty-nine studies of closed postoperative peritoneal lavage were reviewed, including four prospective, randomized studies, eight nonrandomized comparative studies, and 27 noncomparative studies. Mortality rates and abscess rates were determined for various subsets of patients. Despite the large number of studies performed, the therapeutic value of this procedure remains unknown. It is unlikely that further noncomparative or nonrandomized studies will yield useful information. There remains a need for a large-scale, prospective, randomized study to evaluate closed postoperative peritoneal lavage. Smaller prospective, randomized studies can contribute meaningfully if data on the specific causes of peritonitis, severity of disease, and patient age and chronic health status are provided in the form of widely used and well-validated stratification systems.

(Arch Surg 1987;122:1005-1010)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, State University of New York at Stony Brook.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 17, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, Health Sciences Center T-19, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY 11794 (Dr Leiboff).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Circulating Mediators and Organ Function in Patients Undergoing Planned Relaparotomy vs Conventional Surgical Therapy in Severe Secondary Peritonitis
Zugel et al.
Arch Surg 2002;137:590-599.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Chlorhexidine Lavage in the Treatment of Experimental Intra-abdominal Infection
Bondar et al.
Arch Surg 2000;135:309-314.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-term Outcome After Open Treatment of Severe Intra-abdominal Infection and Pancreatic Necrosis
Kriwanek et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:140-144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does Reoperation for Abdominal Sepsis Enhance the Inflammatory Host Response?
Sautner et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:250-255.
ABSTRACT  

Peritoneal Lavage in Abdominal Sepsis: A Controlled Clinical Study
Schein et al.
Arch Surg 1990;125:1132-1135.
ABSTRACT  

The Natural History of Murine Intra-abdominal Abscess Formation
Cheadle et al.
Arch Surg 1988;123:1342-1346.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.