You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 1, January 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (100)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnosis and Operative Indications for Polypoid Lesions of the Gallbladder

Akitoshi Koga, MD; Kiyoaki Watanabe, MD; Tokihiko Fukuyama, MD; Satoshi Takiguchi, MD; Fumio Nakayama, MD

Arch Surg. 1988;123(1):26-29.


Abstract

• In 411 patients undergoing cholecystectomy, benign polyps were present in 32 gallbladders and malignant polyps were present in eight. Histologically, cholesterol polyps accounted for most of the benign lesions, and all the malignant lesions were adenocarcinomas. Gallstones coexisted in 50% of the malignant lesions and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography revealed anomalous pancreaticobiliary junctions in three of five patients with malignant lesions. Sixty-nine percent of patients with benign lesions were under 60 years of age, whereas 75% of those with malignant lesions were over 60. Ninety-four percent of the benign lesions were under 1.0 cm in diameter, while 88% of the malignant lesions exceeded this size. Spread and size of the tumor showed a close correlation. Therefore, size of the tumor is a vital indicator in the treatment of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder, and a malignancy should be considered when the tumor exceeds 1.0 cm in diameter.

(Arch Surg 1988;123:26-29)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery I, Kyushu University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 7, 1987.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery I, Kyushu University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka 812, Japan (Dr Koga).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluation of Biliary Abnormalities with 64-Channel Multidetector CT
Hashimoto et al.
RadioGraphics 2008;28:119-134.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Differential Diagnosis of Gallbladder Diseases With Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Gray Scale Ultrasonography
Numata et al.
J Ultrasound Med 2007;26:763-774.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

From the Archives of the AFIP: Benign Tumors and Tumorlike Lesions of the Gallbladder and Extrahepatic Bile Ducts: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
Levy et al.
RadioGraphics 2002;22:387-413.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of polypoid gall bladder lesions: analysis in surgical and follow up series
Sugiyama et al.
Gut 2000;46:250-254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Small Polypoid Lesions of the Gallbladder: Differential Diagnosis and Surgical Indications by Helical Computed Tomography
Furukawa et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:735-739.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Natural history of polypoid lesions of the gall bladder • Reply
KYRIACOU and SATO
Gut 1997;41:577a-580.
FULL TEXT  

Carcinoma of the Gallbladder: Does Radical Resection Improve Outcome?
Donohue et al.
Arch Surg 1990;125:237-241.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.