You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 11, November 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SURGICAL INFECTION SOCIETY, SAN FRANCISCO, MAY 5 TO MAY 6, 1988
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Lymphocyte Phenotype and Function Changes in Burn Patients After Intravenous IgG Therapy

David G. Burleson, PhD; Arthur D. Mason, Jr, MD; Albert T. McManus, PhD; Basil A. Pruitt, Jr, MD

Arch Surg. 1988;123(11):1379-1382.


Abstract

• The effects of prophylactic administration of intravenous IgG on immune-cell phenotype and function in burn patients were compared with those of patients receiving standard therapy. Intravenous IgG infusions were given twice weekly for three weeks postburn or until wound closure. Intravenous IgG had no effect on the proportion of total T-lymphocytes, T-helper lymphocytes, or T-suppressor lymphocytes, but the proportion of B-lymphocytes decreased 40% in treated patient samples. Lymphocytes from treated patients incorporated less thymidine when stimulated with concanavalin A or pokeweed mitogen, but not with phytohemagglutinin. The amount of IgM secreted by pokeweed mitogen-stimulated cultures from treated patients increased by 24%, while the amount of IgG remained constant. The changes in β-lymphocyte number and functional response may have been induced by the increased serum IgG levels in the intravenous IgG—treated patients.

(Arch Surg 1988;123:1379-1382)



Author Affiliations

From the US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, Tex.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 17, 1988.

Read before the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Surgical Infection Society, San Francisco, May 5, 1988.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.

Reprint requests to the Library Branch, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX 78234-6200.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.