You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 4, April 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 11TH ANNUAL SURGICAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE ASSOCIATION OF VETERANS ADMINISTRATION SURGEONS, PORTLAND, ORE, MAY 6-9, 1987
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prevention of Contraction of Patched Intestinal Defects

Jon S. Thompson, MD; Tim C. Hollingsed; Shailendra K. Saxena, MD

Arch Surg. 1988;123(4):428-430.


Abstract

• Neomucosal growth on a serosal patch might increase intestinal surface area in the short-bowel syndrome but is limited by contraction of the patched defect. Our aim was to reduce contraction by mechanical or pharmacologic means. Ileal defects (2x5 cm) were patched with colon serosa in 14 rabbits. Group 1 (n=5) had a plastic splint sutured to the defect edge. Group 2 (n=4) received hydrocortisone acetate and vitamin A. Group 3 (n=5) was the control group. Four weeks after patching there was significantly less contraction in groups 1 and 2 compared with group 3 (72.3%±5.6% and 50.0%±5.8% vs 31.9%±1.8% initial defect size). Epithelial coverage of the defect was greater in groups 1 and 3 than in group 2. Disaccharidase activity of neomucosa and surrounding mucosa was significantly decreased in the steroid-treated rabbits. Contraction of a serosal patch can be reduced by mechanical and pharmacologic measures that may enhance the clinical applicability of this technique.

(Arch Surg 1988;123:428-430)



Author Affiliations

From the Omaha Veterans Administration Hospital (Dr Thompson) and the Departments of Surgery (Dr Thompson and Mr Hollingsed) and Anatomy (Dr Saxena), University of Nebraska and Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 10, 1987.

Read before the Association of Veterans Administration Surgeons, Portland, Ore, May 7, 1987.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 42nd and Dewey Avenue, Omaha, NE 68105 (Dr Thompson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Effect of Intestinal Resection and Urogastrone on Intestinal Regeneration
Thompson et al.
Arch Surg 1990;125:1617-1621.
ABSTRACT  

Effect of Eflorithine on Intestinal Regeneration
Thompson et al.
Arch Surg 1989;124:454-457.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.