You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 4, April 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 11TH ANNUAL SURGICAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE ASSOCIATION OF VETERANS ADMINISTRATION SURGEONS, PORTLAND, ORE, MAY 6-9, 1987
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (31)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Doppler Ultrasound, Laser Doppler, and Perfusion Fluorometry in Bowel Ischemia

Thomas G. Lynch, MD; Robert W. Hobson, II, MD; John C. Kerr; David A. Brousseau; David G. Silverman, MD; Cheryl A. Reilly, RN; Howard Tseng, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1988;123(4):483-486.


Abstract

• Improved accuracy and objectivity in the evaluation of Intestinal viability has been reported by some investigators using Doppler ultrasound, and more recently laser Doppler velocimetry and perfusion fluorometry. To compare the sensitivity and clinical applicability of these techniques, intestinal viability was evaluated by each method in nine 15- to 50-cm loops of small bowel prepared by division of the mesenteric vasculature in five anesthetized dogs. The sensitivity of Doppler ultrasound was 86%, of laser Doppler flow velocity 85%, of laser Doppler index 94%, and of perfusion fluorometry 95%. Though the sensitivity of Doppler ultrasound is significantly less than that of laser Doppler and perfusion fluorometry, this is not unexpected since the latter two techniques are more quantitative than Doppler ultrasound. Clinically, Doppler ultrasound compares favorably with laser Doppler and perfusion fluorometry, and its low cost and simplicity suggest its adjunctive use in the operative setting.

(Arch Surg 1988;123:483-486)



Author Affiliations

From the Surgical Service, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Boston (Dr Lynch); the Department of Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine (Drs Lynch and Hobson and Mr Kerr); the Anesthesia (Mr Brousseau and Ms Reilly) and Pathology (Dr Tseng) Services, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Philadelphia; and the Department of Anesthesia, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn (Dr Silverman).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 11, 1987.

Read before the Association of Veterans Administration Surgeons, Portland, Ore, May 7, 1987.

Reprint requests to Surgical Service (112), Veterans Administration Medical Center, 150 S Huntington Ave, Boston, MA 02130 (Dr Lynch).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prognosis of Ischemic Colitis: Comparison of Color Doppler Sonography with Early Clinical and Laboratory Findings
Danse et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000;175:1151-1154.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Blood Flow and Myoelectric Measurements in Two Chronic Models of Mesenteric Ligation
Brolin et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:147-152.
ABSTRACT  

Endotoxemia: Its Relationship to Colonic Ischemia and Aortic Surgery: A Preliminary Report
Welch et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 1993;27:591-596.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.