You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 4, April 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Cost of treating advanced leg ischemia. Bypass graft vs primary amputation

C. A. Raviola, L. S. Nichter, J. D. Baker, R. W. Busuttil, H. I. Machleder and W. S. Moore
Vascular Surgery Section, UCLA School of Medicine.

We compared the hospital costs of 94 patients undergoing femoropopliteal bypass grafts with those of 53 patients undergoing primary amputation. The total cost of uncomplicated bypass surgery averaged +20,300, compared with +14,000 for uncomplicated below-knee amputation. However, including the cost of prosthesis and rehabilitation, the total cost of primary amputation was +20,400, equivalent to that of the bypass operation. Complications requiring revision of a bypass graft increased hospitalization by 4.5 days with the total cost rising to +28,700; complications that ended with major amputation added 15 hospitalization days and had an average cost of +42,200. In contrast, complicated below-knee amputation cost +40,600 and added 12.5 hospitalization days. There is therefore no cost-benefit in primary amputation when compared with arterial reconstruction, and cost should not be used to deny a patient the opportunity for limb salvage.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.