You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 5, May 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 68TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SURGICAL SOCIETY, BRETTON WOODS, NH, SEPT 11 TO SEPT 13, 1987
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pericardial Flap Prevents Sternal Wound Complications

William C. Nugent, MD; Elizabeth L. Maislen, RN; Gerald T. O'Connor, PhD, DSc; Charles A. S. Marrin, MB, BS; Stephen K. Plume, MD

Arch Surg. 1988;123(5):636-639.


Abstract

• By interposing a pedicle of pericardium between the heart and sternum, mediastinitis may be prevented and sternal healing facilitated. Between Jan 1, 1984, and mid-1986, before we began using the pericardial flap, the overall incidence of mediastinitis and/or sternal wound dehiscence was 2.73% (26 of 952 patients). This rate did not differ significantly among three surgeons (2.53%, 2.95%, and 2.69%). During mid-1986, two of the three surgeons adopted the use of the pericardial flap and used it on 226 of 270 patients. None of these 270 patients developed mediastinitis or sternal wound dehiscence. The third surgeon did not adopt the use of the flap and operated on 100 patients during the same period. In this group, there were three cases of mediastinitis. This difference was statistically significant. No specific complications attributable to construction of a pericardial flap were identified in our patients. We conclude that the routine use of a pericardial flap is a safe, simple, and effective means of preventing mediastinitis and/or sternal dehiscence following cardiac surgery.

(Arch Surg 1988;123:636-639)



Author Affiliations

From the Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery (Drs Nugent, Marrin, and Plume, and Ms Maislen) and the Departments of Community Medicine and Family Medicine (Dr O'Connor), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, NH.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Jan 27, 1988.

Read before the Annual Meeting of the New England Surgical Society, Bretton Woods, NH, Sept 13, 1987.

Reprint requests to the Section of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Hanover, NH 03756 (Dr Nugent).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Simplified treatment of postoperative mediastinitis
Merrill et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2004;78:608-612.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery)
Eagle et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1262-1347.
FULL TEXT  

Pericardial Flaps Prevent Wound Complications
ZOLLINGER
Arch Surg 1988;123:1526-1526.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.