You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 8, August 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Extrahepatic tumor deposits misdiagnosed as intrahepatic metastases

K. S. Hughes, D. L. Miller, R. Neuman and P. H. Sugarbaker
Winship Cancer Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322.

Focal hepatic lesions seen on roentgenologic evaluation of the liver in patients with cancer are usually assumed to be caused by parenchymal metastases. In this report, liver imaging tests showed six patients with filling defects caused by peritoneal carcinoma indenting the liver parenchyma. Extrahepatic tumor deposits were misdiagnosed in all but one of these cases. The roentgenographic characteristics that can assist in the differentiation of intrahepatic and extrahepatic metastases are a lens-shaped defect, a defect adjacent to the hemidiaphragm, and a halo around the liver suggesting peritoneal carcinomatosis. A high index of suspicion for extra-hepatic tumor masses causing intrahepatic filling defects may help prevent unnecessary exploratory surgery for treatment of hepatic metastases. Angiography may occasionally be helpful in distinguishing intrahepatic from extrahepatic disease.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.