You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 9, September 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

The treatment of breast cancer: II. A 20-year follow-up and reappraisal of the en bloc principle

C. G. Peterson
Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201.

This retrospective study of the extended Oregon Series (1940 to 1965) of patients with breast cancer, first reported in 1961, compares the now long-term results of treatment of pathologic stage T2/3 NO breast cancers with intent to cure by the following two en bloc ablative operative procedures of variable extent and completeness: standard radical mastectomy vs ultraradical mastectomy. The extent and completeness of the en bloc procedure are shown again to be critical determinants of local control and survival. The local recurrence rate for standard radical mastectomy is 12.4% (8/70) and for ultraradical mastectomy it is 0% (0/78). Proportionate survival at 20 years for standard radical mastectomy was 59.8% (95% confidence limits, 0.598 +/- 0.14) and for ultraradical mastectomy it was 98.1% (95% confidence limits, 0.981 +/- 0.04).





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.