You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 9, September 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 59TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE PACIFIC COAST SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, SAN FRANCISCO, FEB 21 TO FEB 24, 1988
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Diagnostic and Surgical Implications of Child Abuse

Daniel J. Ledbetter, MD; Edwin I. Hatch, Jr, MD; Kenneth W. Feldman, MD; Corinne L. Fligner, MD; David Tapper, MD

Arch Surg. 1988;123(9):1101-1105.


Abstract

• One hundred fifty-six children younger than 13 years of age with blunt abdominal injuries were reviewed, and those injured in accidents (89%) were compared with those injured by child abuse (11%). Abused children were younger (mean age, 21/2 years) and all presented late to medical attention with a history that was inconsistent with their physical findings. Only 65% of abused children had physical or roentgenographic signs of prior abuse, while 35% had no signs of prior abuse. The abdominal organs injured were different; 61% of accidentally injured children suffered injuries to a single, solid organ, and only 8% had hollow viscus injuries, while 65% of abused children had hollow viscus injuries. Physicians should suspect child abuse when children have unexplained injuries (especially young children with hollow viscus injuries) even when other signs of child abuse are absent, and they should suspect hollow viscus injury in abused children.

(Arch Surg 1988;123:1101-1105)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Ledbetter, Hatch, and Tapper) and Medicine (Dr Feldman), Children's Hospital and Medical Center; the Departments of Surgery (Drs Ledbetter, Hatch, and Tapper), Pediatrics (Dr Feldman), and Pathology (Dr Fligner), University of Washington; and the King County Medical Examiner's Office, Seattle (Dr Fligner).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 1, 1988.

Read before the 59th Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, San Francisco, Feb 22, 1988.

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital and Medical Center, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, PO Box C 5371, Seattle, WA 98105 (Dr Tapper).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnostic Imaging of Child Abuse
Section on Radiology
Pediatrics 2009;123:1430-1435.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Blunt Abdominal Injury in the Young Pediatric Patient: Child Abuse and Patient Outcomes
Trokel et al.
Child Maltreat 2004;9:111-117.
ABSTRACT  

From the Archives of the AFIP: Child Abuse: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation
Lonergan et al.
RadioGraphics 2003;23:811-845.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Duodenal perforation: a diagnostic pitfall in non-accidental injury
Champion et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2002;87:432-433.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Can Falls on Stairs Result in Small Intestine Perforations?
Huntimer et al.
Pediatrics 2000;106:301-305.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.