You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 9, September 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Hematuria following blunt abdominal trauma. The utility of intravenous pyelography

S. Klein, S. Johs, R. Fujitani and D. State
Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance 90509.

To clarify the indications for intravenous pyelography (IVP) and nephrotomography (NT) in the evaluation of patients with hematuria following blunt thoracoabdominal trauma, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted during a one-year period who had undergone IVP and NT for suspected renal injury. One hundred thirty-four patients were reviewed, and the findings of IVP and NT correlated with the magnitude of hematuria on urinalysis, associated injuries, management, and outcome. Sixty-two (46%) of 134 patients had fewer than ten red blood cells per high-power field (RBCs/HPF) on urinalysis (group 1), 19 (14%) of 134 patients had 10 to 30 RBCs/HPF (group 2), and 53 (40%) of 134 patients had greater than 30 RBCs/HPF (group 3). Twenty-seven patients had renal injuries detected by IVP and NT, two in group 2 and 25 in group 3. We conclude that IVP and NT should be reserved for patients with greater than 30 RBCs/HPF on admission urinalysis.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.