You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 1, January 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, NEW ORLEANS, MAY 22 TO MAY 25, 1988-Pa rt I
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Rationale for Aggressive Colonoscopy in Patients With Colorectal Neoplasia

Kumar S. Dasmahapatra, MD; Kevin Lopyan, MD

Arch Surg. 1989;124(1):63-66.


Abstract

• The role of colonoscopy in patients with colorectal neoplasia is not well established. The results of colonoscopy, from 1982 through 1987, in 42 patients with cancers who underwent preoperative colonoscopy (group 1), 64 patients with benign polyps (group 2), and 51 patients who were examined only postoperatively (group 3) were reviewed. These results indicated that(1) approximately one third of all findings would have been missed if endoscopy had been performed to only 60 cm; (2) there was a high incidence of synchronous lesions (33.3% in group 1 and 34.4% in group 2); (3) 57% of patients with synchronous cancer and 63.6% of patients with synchronous polyps developed metachronous lesions, compared with 10.7% and 11.9% of patients with a single lesion; (4) there was a higher incidence of metachronous lesions seen in group 3, compared with group 1; and (5) the median interval for noting metachronous lesions in patients who underwent colonoscopy preoperatively was approximately 18 months. These findings endorsed preoperative colonoscopy and aggressive follow-up in patients with colorectal tumors.

(Arch Surg 1989;124:63-66)



Author Affiliations

From The Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey–New Jersey Medical School, Newark, and East Orange (NJ) Veterans Administration Medical Center.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 15, 1988.

Read before the Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, New Orleans, May 24, 1988.

Reprint requests to Surgical Service (112), Veterans Administration Medical Center, East Orange, NJ 07019 (Dr Dasmahapatra).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Automated Carbon Dioxide Insufflation for CT Colonography: Effectiveness of Colonic Distention in Cancer Patients with Severe Luminal Narrowing
Kim et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2008;190:698-706.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Occlusive Colon Carcinoma: Virtual Colonoscopy in the Preoperative Evaluation of the Proximal Colon
Fenlon et al.
Radiology 1999;210:423-428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.