You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 10, October 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 60TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE PACIFIC COAST SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, VANCOUVER, CANADA, FEBRUARY 22, 1989
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (80)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Esophageal Perforation

Arthur E. Flynn, MD; Edward D. Verrier, MD; Lawrence W. Way, MD; Arthur N. Thomas, MD; Carlos A. Pellegrini, MD

Arch Surg. 1989;124(10):1211-1215.


Abstract



• Sixty-nine patients with perforation of the esophagus were treated at the University of California, San Francisco, from 1977 to 1988. The perforation was iatrogenic in 33 (48%) of the patients, spontaneous in 8 (12%), and a result of external trauma in 23 (33%). Clinical findings included chest pain in 36 (52%) of 69 patients, subcutaneous emphysema in 22 (32%) of 59 patients, and pneumomediastinum in 21 (36%) of 59 patients. Esophagograms demonstrated the perforation in 40 (93%) of 43 patients. Treatment delays of more than 24 hours occurred in about half of spontaneous and iatrogenic perforations, but when the perforation was due to external trauma, treatment was delayed infrequently. Operative therapy in 59 (86%) of the patients included primary closure in 44 patients, drainage alone in 9 patients, and Celestin tube placement in 1 patient. Four patients with benign strictures had esophagectomy, and 4 patients with achalasia had Heller myotomy in addition to closure of the perforation. Eight (12%) of the patients were treated nonoperatively. For thoracic perforations, nonoperative treatment was reserved for patients who were diagnosed late but who had minimal evidence of sepsis. Seven (10%) of the patients died. Factors that influenced outcome included cause of perforation, anatomic location, and patient age. Our study shows that a high index of suspicion, aggressive use of esophagography, and individualized treatment are necessary for the best results when treating esophageal perforation.

(Arch Surg. 1989;124:1211-1215)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Surgery, University of California Medical Center, San Francisco.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication June 12, 1989.

Read before the 60th Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, Vancouver, Canada, February 22, 1989.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, U122, University of California Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94143 (Dr Pellegrini).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Conservative management of iatrogenic esophageal perforation in head and neck cancer patients with esophageal stricture
Mao et al.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;140:505-511.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Unusual case of Boerhaave syndrome, diagnosed late and successfully treated by Abbott's T-tube
Santini et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2007;134:539-540.
FULL TEXT  

Conservative Approach to the Mediastinitis in Childhood Secondary to Esophageal Perforation
Demirbag et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2005;44:131-134.
ABSTRACT  

Evolving options in the management of esophageal perforation
Brinster et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2004;77:1475-1483.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Thoracic esophageal perforations: a decade of experience
Port et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2003;75:1071-1074.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Primary esophageal repair for Boerhaave's syndrome
Lawrence et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1999;67:818-820.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Reinforced primary repair of thoracic esophageal perforation
Wright et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1995;60:245-249.
ABSTRACT  

Intrathoracic esophageal perforation: The merit of primary repair
Whyte et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1995;109:140-146.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Atypical presentation of spontaneous pneumomediastinum
Ralph-Edwards and Pearson
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1994;58:1758-1760.
ABSTRACT  

Surgical Repair of Esophageal Perforation due to Pneumatic Dilatation for Achalasia: Is Myotomy Really Necessary?
Pricolo et al.
Arch Surg 1993;128:540-544.
ABSTRACT  

Primary repair of iatrogenic thoracic esophageal perforation and Boerhaave's syndrome
Ohri et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1993;55:603-606.
ABSTRACT  

Esophageal perforation: A therapeutic challenge
Attar et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1990;50:45-49.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.