You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 2, February 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer. Long-term cosmetic results

M. A. Rose, I. Olivotto, B. Cady, C. Koufman, R. Osteen, B. Silver, A. Recht and J. R. Harris
Joint Center for Radiation Therapy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

To evaluate the cosmetic outcome of conservative surgery (CS) and radiation therapy (RT) for early-stage breast cancer and its stability over time, we reviewed the records of 593 patients treated from 1968 to 1981. The breast appearance was scored as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor". Median follow-up was 76 months (range, 37 to 186 months). Cosmetic results were generally excellent or good. The percents of excellent, good, fair, and poor results at three years were 65%, 25%, 7%, and 3%, respectively. Patients not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were more likely than those receiving chemotherapy to have excellent scores at five years (71% vs 40%). Tumor size also influenced cosmetic outcome: 73% of patients with T1 tumors vs 55% with T2 tumors had excellent scores at five years. Our results were stable over time: of 36 patients assessable at seven years whose cosmetic scores were good or excellent at three years, 34 (94%) continued to have good or excellent scores, and only two (5%) deteriorated to fair. We conclude that the cosmetic results achieved with CS and RT are good to excellent in approximately 90% of patients and that these results remain stable for at least seven years.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Effect of Multiple Reexcisions on the Risk of Local Recurrence After Breast Conserving Surgery
O'Sullivan et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:3133-3140.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Superiority of Sonographic Hematoma Guided Resection of Mammogram Only Visible Breast Cancer: Wire Localization Should be an Exception Not the Rule
Rahman et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:2228-2232.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Initial Outcomes for Patients Treated on the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Clinical Trial for Ductal Carcinoma-In-Situ of the Breast
Jeruss et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2006;13:967-976.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lumpectomy plus Tamoxifen with or without Irradiation in Women 70 Years of Age or Older with Early Breast Cancer
Hughes et al.
NEJM 2004;351:971-977.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Ink-Directed and Traditional Whole-Cavity Re-Excision for Breast Lumpectomy Specimens With Positive Margins
Gibson et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2001;8:693-704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cosmetic Outcome in Patients Receiving an Interstitial Implant as Part of Breast-Conservation Therapy
Kramer et al.
Radiology 1999;213:61-66.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.