You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 2, February 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, NEW ORLEANS, LA, MAY 22 TO MAY 25, 1988-Part II
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (72)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Scar or Recurrent Rectal Cancer

Positron Emission Tomography Is More Helpful for Diagnosis Than Immunoscintigraphy

Peter Schlag, MD; Burkhard Lehner, MD; Ludwig G. Strauss, MD; Peter Georgi, MD; Christian Herfarth, MD

Arch Surg. 1989;124(2):197-200.


Abstract

• We used positron emission tomography and fludeoxyglucose F 18 to assess metabolic activity of a pelvic mass in 18 patients who had suspected recurrent rectal cancer. Computed tomography could not differentiate tumor from scar. All patients presenting increased uptake of fludeoxyglucose F 18 by the mass were proved by histologic studies to suffer from recurrent tumor. Six of seven patients with low fludeoxyglucose uptake had nonmalignant lesions. Using immunoscintigraphy in 14 patients with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels, only four of ten recurrences could be identified by increased antibody accumulation in the mass. On the other hand, two of four benign lesions were interpreted as being recurrent tumor because of high uptake. Therefore, only positron emission tomography seems to be a useful diagnostic tool in the differentiation of recurrent rectal cancer and scar by providing information about the metabolic activity of a mass.

(Arch Surg 1989;124:197-200)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Schlag, Lehner, and Herfarth) and Nuclear Medicine (Dr Georgi), University of Heidelberg, and the Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (Dr Strauss), Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany.; Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimerfeld 110, 6900 Heidelberg, Federal Republic of Germany (Dr Schlag).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 6, 1988.

Read before the Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, New Orleans, May 25, 1988.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

FDG PET and Immunoscintigraphy with 99mTc-Labeled Antibody Fragments for Detection of the Recurrence of Colorectal Carcinoma
Willkomm et al.
JNM 2000;41:1657-1663.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.