You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 2, February 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, NEW ORLEANS, LA, MAY 22 TO MAY 25, 1988-Part II
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (61)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Photodynamic Therapy for Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Malignant Neoplasms

James S. McCaughan, Jr, MD; Jerry T. Guy, MD; William Hicks, MD; Leslie Laufman, MD; Thomas A. Nims, MD; John Walker

Arch Surg. 1989;124(2):211-216.


Abstract

• Twenty-seven patients with cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant neoplasms were treated with photodynamic therapy. Therapy was administered to 248 areas during a total of 72 separate treatment sessions after patients received a total of 45 injections of sensitizer. Seven patients had basal cell carcinoma, three had squamous cell carcinoma, three had malignant melanoma, one had liposarcoma, and 12 had breast cancers. One patient had Bowen's disease. Treatment was given either by surface radiation or interstitially. One month after treatment, 48 (67%) of the treatment sessions resulted in a complete response (no clinical evidence of tumor), and 19 (26%) resulted in a partial response (>50% reduction in the number or size of tumors). Fifteen patients were examinable 12 months after treatment, and in this group, 31 treatment sessions were evaluated as a complete response one month after therapy, 15 (48%) of which retained this status at one year after treatment. By comparing the ability of different light-delivery instrumentation, it was concluded that the Yellow Springs radiometer (Yellow Springs Instruments, model 65A Yellow Springs, Ohio) provided the most reliable spot power density readings. Straight-tipped fibers are nonhomogeneous and can result in overtreatment of the central area with necrosis and pain and in undertreatment of the periphery.

(Arch Surg 1989;124:211-216)



Author Affiliations

From the Laser Medical Research Foundation, Columbus, Ohio.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept 2, 1988.

Read before the Annual Meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, New Orleans, May 23, 1988.

Reprint requests to 323 E Town St, Columbus, OH 43215 (Dr McCaughan).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Lasers in Dermatology--1993
Hruza et al.
Arch Dermatol 1993;129:1026-1035.
ABSTRACT  

Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma
Wilson et al.
Arch Dermatol 1992;128:1597-1601.
ABSTRACT  

Photodynamic Therapy in Dermatology: Shedding a Different Light on Skin Disease
Lui and Anderson
Arch Dermatol 1992;128:1631-1636.
ABSTRACT  

Photodynamic Therapy to Treat Tumors of the Extrahepatic Biliary Ducts: A Case Report
McCaughan et al.
Arch Surg 1991;126:111-113.
ABSTRACT  

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lower Lip Involving a Large Cutaneous Surface: Photodynamic Therapy as an Alternative Therapy
Gross et al.
Arch Dermatol 1990;126:1148-1150.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.