You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 2, February 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Follow-up of Patients With Aspirated Breast Cysts Is Necessary

Hisham Hamed, MD; Andrew Coady, MS; Murid A. Chaudary; Ian S. Fentiman, MD

Arch Surg. 1989;124(2):253-255.


Abstract

• A review was conducted of 401 women who presented with breast lumps that proved to be cysts by yielding fluid on aspiration. The aim was to determine the proportion of patients with cancers that masqueraded as cysts and to establish whether short-term follow-up was necessary. After the first visit, six patients had biopsies because of a residual mass or a bloodstained aspirate. Of these patients, two were found to have cancer. After the follow-up visit, 20 further biopsies were carried out for presence of a mass, bloodstained fluid, or recurrent fluid, and two more cancers were diagnosed. Of the four patients with malignancy, only one had an intracystic carcinoma, two had necrotic grade 3 ductal carcinomas, and one had a malignant phyllode tumor. These findings underline the value of a single return visit after cyst aspiration.

(Arch Surg 1989;124:253-255)



Author Affiliations

From the Clinical Oncology Unit (Drs Hamed and Fentiman and Mr Chaudary) and Department of Clinical Microscopy (Mr Coady), Guy's Hospital, London.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Dec 3, 1987.

Reprint requests to Clinical Oncology Unit, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, England (Dr Fentiman).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Benign Breast Diseases: Classification, Diagnosis, and Management
Mannello and Tonti
The Oncologist 2006;11:1132-1134.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Abnormal Mammography Results and Palpable Breast Abnormalities
Kerlikowske et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:274-284.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.