You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 3, March 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (27)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Errors in Estimating Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Surgical Patients

Vincente Cortes, MD; Loren D. Nelson, MD

Arch Surg. 1989;124(3):287-290.


Abstract

• Thirty-one critically ill surgical patients were receiving central parenteral nutrition. All were intubated, and 29 were receiving mechanical ventilatory support. Nutritional and metabolic data were recorded at the time of indirect calorimetry. Measured energy expenditure (MEE) was compared with predictions of basal energy expenditure (BEE) and calculated energy expenditure, defined as the product of BEE and a stress factor estimated by the nutrition support service to account for severity of illness and activity. The MEE was significantly greater than the BEE and significantly less than the calculated energy expenditure. The estimated stress factor was significantly greater than the actual MEE/BEE ratio, and the correlation between these values was poor. Clinical assessment may overestimate energy expenditure in critically ill patients because of the apparent degree of illness used to determine the stress factor. Bedside indirect calorimetry may be useful to assess more accurately energy expenditure and optimize nutritional support.

(Arch Surg 1989;124:287-290)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine (Dr Cortes) and Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn (Dr Nelson).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication July 15, 1988.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Energy Expenditure in Hospitalized Patients: Implications for Nutritional Support
Miles
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:809-816.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Protein and energy provision in critical illness
Hoffer
Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003;78:906-911.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Thermodilution Technique for Measuring Resting Energy Expenditure Does Not Agree With Indirect Calorimetry for the Critically III Patient
Ogawa et al.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1998;22:347-351.
ABSTRACT  

Accuracy of 30-Minute Indirect Calorimetry Studies in Predicting 24-Hour Energy Expenditure in Mechanically Ventilated, Critically Ill Patients
Smyrnios et al.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1997;21:168-174.
ABSTRACT  

Invited Review: Nutrition Support in Critical Illness
Barton
Nutr Clin Pract 1994;9:127-139.
ABSTRACT  

A Method for Increasing Confidence in Respiratory Gas Exchange Measurements in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Sue and Wolff
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1991;15:625-629.
ABSTRACT  

Are Estimating Energy Expenditures in Hospitalized Patients Appropriate?
LONG
Arch Surg 1989;124:1464-1465.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.