You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 5, May 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 69TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE NEW ENGLAND SURGICAL SOCIETY, MONTREAL, CANADA, SEPT 15 TO SEPT 17, 1988
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (52)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Management of Pancreatic Fistulas

F. Maureen Martin, MD; Ricardo L. Rossi, MD; J. Lawrence Munson, MD; Stephen G. ReMine, MD; John W. Braasch, MD

Arch Surg. 1989;124(5):571-573.


Abstract

• Conservative management of pancreatic fistulas resulting from trauma, operation for tumor, or operation for pancreatitis has met with variable success. To assess optimal management strategies and outcome, we reviewed the records of 35 patients with external pancreatic fistulas (26 patients), pancreatic ascites (6 patients), or pancreatic pleural effusion (3 patients). Treatment included no operation in 5 patients, oversewing of the fistula in 7 patients, internal drainage in 11 patients, and resection in 12 patients. One (3%) postoperative death occurred. The overall rate of operative success was 83% (25 patients). The incidence of recurrent fistulas was about the same regardless of the procedure. Patients treated successfully without operation did not have pancreatitis as an underlying disease. Patient selection is of great importance in the decision to resect or to drain and is based in part on imaging the pancreatic duct and fistula.

(Arch Surg. 1989;124:571-573)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of General Surgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, Burlington, Mass.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication December 13, 1988.

Read before the 69th Annual Meeting of the New England Surgical Society, Montreal, Canada, September 18, 1988.

Reprint requests to Department of General Surgery, Lahey Clinic Medical Center, 41 Mall Rd, Burlington, MA 01805 (Dr Braasch).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Persistent Pancreatocutaneous Fistula after Percutaneous Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Role of Cause and Severity of Pancreatitis
Fotoohi et al.
Radiology 1999;213:573-578.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Analysis of Pancreatic Fistula After Pancreatic Head Resection
Sato et al.
Arch Surg 1998;133:1094-1098.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Complications Associated With Severe Pancreatitis
Ho and Frey
Arch Surg 1995;130:817-823.
ABSTRACT  

Incidence and Management of Pancreatic and Enteric Fistulas After Surgical Management of Severe Necrotizing Pancreatitis
Tsiotos et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:48-52.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.