You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 7, July 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 96TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, SAN DIEGO, CALIF, NOV14-16, 1988
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Endoscopic Cholangiography and Stone Removal Prior to Cholecystectomy

A More Cost-effective Approach Than Operative Duct Exploration?

Greg Van Stiegmann, MD; Nathan W. Pearlman, MD; John S. Goff, MD; John H. Sun, MD; Lawrence W. Norton, MD

Arch Surg. 1989;124(7):787-790.


Abstract

• Would economic benefit result from performing endoscopic cholangiography and removal of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy in patients who are suspected preoperatively of having choledocholithiasis? In this study, 173 patients had cholecystectomy and 30 (17%) had common bile duct exploration. Records of these patients were reviewed as were those of 31 patients who had only endoscopic cholangiography and endoscopic stone removal. Cost estimates were based on local charges. Cholecystectomy with common bile duct exploration was $6730 more per patient than cholecystectomy alone. Endoscopic cholangiography and endoscopic stone removal was 87% successful in removing duct stones. Had endoscopic cholangiography and endoscopic stone removal been performed preoperatively in patients undergoing cholecystectomy who had suspected choledocholithiasis, 21 of 30 common bile duct explorations could theoretically have been eliminated. This would have saved $85 526 or $2851 per patient undergoing common bile duct exploration. Our analysis suggests that patients who require cholecystectomy and have suspected choledocholithiasis may be treated more cost-effectively by performing endoscopic cholangiography and endoscopic stone removal immediately prior to cholecystectomy than by cholecystectomy and operative common bile duct exploration.

(Arch Surg. 1989;124:787-790)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Gastrointestinal/Tumor) (Drs Stiegmann, Pearlman, Sun, and Norton) and Medicine (Gastroenterology) (Dr Goff), University of Colorado and Denver Veterans Administration Hospitals.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 11, 1989.

Read before the 96th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, San Diego, Calif, November 14, 1988.

Reprint requests to University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Box C-313, 4200 E Ninth Ave, Denver, CO 80262 (Dr Stiegmann).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Bile Duct Stones in the Laparoscopic Era: Is Preoperative Sphincterotomy Necessary?
Phillips et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:880-886.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.