You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 7, July 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 96TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE WESTERN SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, SAN DIEGO, CALIF, NOV14-16, 1988
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (39)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Myocardial Contusion

When Can the Diagnosis Be Eliminated?

Frank B. Miller, MD; Charles R. Shumate, MD; J. David Richardson, MD

Arch Surg. 1989;124(7):805-808.


Abstract

• The clinical significance of various diagnostic tests and the length of monitoring required for myocardial contusion were evaluated in 172 patients. Cardiac isoenzyme levels, electrocardiograms, and echocardiograms were evaluated. Twenty-eight patients had a documented myocardial contusion based on at least one positive diagnostic study. The majority of positive studies were detected on admission and all positive tests were present within 24 hours. No patients developed positive diagnostic studies after 24 hours and, likewise, no clinical deterioration occurred late or in patients with a negative screening examination. The electrocardiogram and the clinical course were the primary determinants of the need for cardiac monitoring and therapeutic intervention. Cardiac isoenzyme levels had negligible significance on outcome, and the two-dimensional echocardiogram was not particularly valuable as a screening technique. If no abnormality is detected within 24 hours post injury, further investigation or monitoring does not appear warranted.

(Arch Surg. 1989;124:805-808)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, University of Louisville (Ky) School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication April 5, 1989.

Read before the 96th Annual Meeting of the Western Surgical Association, San Diego, Calif, November 15, 1988.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292 (Dr Miller).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Bifascicular Block Complicating Blunt Cardiac Injury: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Pontillo et al.
ANGIOLOGY 1994;45:883-890.
ABSTRACT  

Diagnosis of Myocardial Contusion: Quantitative Analysis of Single Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Scans
Godbe et al.
Arch Surg 1992;127:888-892.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.