You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 9, September 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (22)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Preoperative Screening for HIV Infection

A Balanced View for the Practicing Surgeon

Arthur M. Fournier, MD; Robert Zeppa, MD

Arch Surg. 1989;124(9):1038-1040.


Abstract

• Routine preoperative screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is becoming increasingly prevalent. Reasons in favor of routine screening include the following: (1) Knowledge of HIV status may allow the surgeon to decrease risk of infection. (2) The patient may benefit, because HIV infection may alter the risk-benefit ratio of a procedure. (3) Knowledge of HIV status will not affect how the patient is treated. Arguments against routine screening include the following: (1) Since the risk during individual procedures is low, it is unlikely that knowledge of HIV status can actually reduce risk. (2) Patient care may be negatively affected. (3) There is a possibility of false-positive results. (4) The accepted ethical standards of autonomy, confidentiality, and informed consent are not always adhered to. We explore these issues in detail. Recent work has framed the risk of surgeons and defined the reliability of diagnostic screening tests. All of these factors must be weighed before a surgeon can decide for or against a policy of routine preoperative screening.

(Arch Surg. 1989;124:1038-1040)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine (Dr Fournier), and the Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery (Dr Zeppa), University of Miami (Fla) School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication February 11, 1989.

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, PO Box 016960 (R-103), University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101 (Dr Fournier).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Risk of Occupational Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection in Health Care Workers: Italian Multicenter Study
Ippolito et al.
Arch Intern Med 1993;153:1451-1458.
ABSTRACT  

The HIV-Testing Policies of US Hospitals
Lewis and Montgomery
JAMA 1990;264:2764-2767.
ABSTRACT  

Surgery
Organ
JAMA 1990;263:2684-2685.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.