You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 9, September 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Patterns of Relapse in 1001 Consecutive Patients With Melanoma Nodal Metastases

Annamaria Calabro, MD; S. Eva Singletary, MD; Charles M. Balch, MD

Arch Surg. 1989;124(9):1051-1055.


Abstract

• The impact of nodal tumor burden on patterns of relapse and survival was retrospectively analyzed in 1001 patients with stage III melanoma. The incidence of tumor recurrence within the node dissection field was lower in patients with 1 nodal metastasis (9%) or with no extranodal invasion (15%) than in patients with multiple involved nodes (15% to 33%) or connective tissue invasion (28%). Patients with 1 "positive" node (a node in which cancer was detected) had a 45% 5-year and 39% 10-year survival rate compared with patients who had 2 to 4 positive nodes (37% and 28%), 5 to 10 nodes (20% and 17%), more than 10 nodes (5% and 3%), or extranodal invasion (14% and 11%). The occurrence of in-transit metastases in 10% of patients after nodal dissection was not influenced by the extent of nodal tumor burden.

(Arch Surg. 1989;124:1051-1055)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of General Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication February 11, 1989.

Reprint requests to Department of General Surgery, Box 106, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 (Dr Singletary).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma
Testori et al.
Ann Oncol 2009;20:vi22-vi29.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sentinel-Node Biopsy in Melanoma
Balch and Cascinelli
NEJM 2006;355:1370-1371.
FULL TEXT  

The Risk of In-Transit Melanoma Metastasis Depends on Tumor Biology and Not the Surgical Approach to Regional Lymph Nodes
Pawlik et al.
JCO 2005;23:4588-4590.
FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Factors Analysis of 17,600 Melanoma Patients: Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System
Balch et al.
JCO 2001;19:3622-3634.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Final Version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Cutaneous Melanoma
Balch et al.
JCO 2001;19:3635-3648.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Minimal-Access Surgery for Staging of Malignant Melanoma
Krag et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:654-658.
ABSTRACT  

Recurrence Patterns and Outcome in 1019 Patients Undergoing Axillary or Inguinal Lymphadenectomy for Melanoma
Gadd and Coit
Arch Surg 1992;127:1412-1416.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.