You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 10, October 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 61ST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE PACIFIC COAST SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, LAGUNA NIGUEL, CALIF, FEBRUARY 18 TO FEBRUARY 21, 1990
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Is Liver Transplantation Justified for the Treatment of Hepatic Malignancies?

Kim M. Olthoff, MD; J. Michael Millis, MD; Michael H. Rosove, MD; Leonard I. Goldstein, MD; Kenneth P. Ramming, MD; Ronald W. Busuttil, MD, PhD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(10):1261-1268.


Abstract

• Twenty-eight patients received orthotopic liver transplants for malignant disease between February 1, 1984, and December 31, 1989. Preoperative diagnoses included hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 16), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 3), other primary hepatic tumors (n = 6), and metastatic diseases to the liver (n = 3). Overall actuarial survivals at 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years were 67.3%, 51%, and 31%, respectively. Long-term survival longer than 5 years was achieved in 3 patients. The recurrence rate in patients surviving longer than 3 months is 48% (median, 7 months). Hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma had the poorest survival and highest recurrence rates. Specific prognostic factors correlating with survival or recurrence could not be elucidated. These results indicate that orthotopic liver transplants can provide long-term cure and palliation for malignant disease; however, patient selection is extremely important in predicting outcome.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:1261-1268)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Surgery (Drs Olthoff, Millis, Ramming, and Busuttil) and Medicine (Drs Rosove and Goldstein), UCLA School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 2, 1990.

Read before the 61st Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, Laguna Niguel, Calif, February 19, 1990.

Reprint requests to UCLA Department of Surgery, 77-132 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90024 (Dr Busuttil).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Asia
de Villa and Lo
The Oncologist 2007;12:1321-1331.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Orthotopic Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Factors Affecting Long-term Patient Survival
Ojogho et al.
Arch Surg 1996;131:935-941.
ABSTRACT  

Liver Transplantation for the Treatment of Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas in Patients with Cirrhosis
Mazzaferro et al.
NEJM 1996;334:693-700.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Aggressive Surgical Resection for Cholangiocarcinoma
Washburn et al.
Arch Surg 1995;130:270-276.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.