You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 10, October 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 61ST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE PACIFIC COAST SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, LAGUNA NIGUEL, CALIF, FEBRUARY 18 TO FEBRUARY 21, 1990
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (63)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy Is as Safe as Mastectomy Alone

Adele L. Vinton, MD; L. William Traverso, MD; R. David Zehring, MD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(10):1303-1308.


Abstract

• We evaluated wound complications and potential risk factors after mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction and compared them with similar data after modified radical mastectomy. The incidences of infection, seroma, hematoma, and epidermolysis were compared among 395 patients (305 with modified radical mastectomies and 90 with mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction) from Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Wash, between 1983 and 1989. Obesity, age (60 years or older), smoking, antibiotics, and wound drainage were examined as possible risk factors. There were more wound complications in the modified radical mastectomy group (48% vs 31%), and specifically, more seromas (30% vs 13%). In the modified radical mastectomy group, age of 60 years or older was associated with seroma and infection, drainage greater than 30 mL per day (at time of drain removal) with seroma, and smoking with epidermolysis. In the mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction group, obesity was associated with seroma and epidermolysis. We conclude that mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction appears to be as safe as modified radical mastectomy alone with respect to wound complications.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:1303-1308)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of General (Drs Vinton and Traverso) and Plastic Surgery (Dr Zehring), Virginia Mason Clinic, Seattle, Wash.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 22, 1990.

Read before the 61st Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, Laguna Niguel, Calif, February 19, 1990.

Reprint requests to Virginia Mason Clinic, 1100 Ninth Ave C6-N, Seattle, WA 98101 (Dr Traverso).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Multilevel Analysis of the Impact of Community vs Patient Factors on Access to Immediate Breast Reconstruction Following Mastectomy in Maryland
Rosson et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:1076-1081.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction
Fernandez-Delgado et al.
Ann Oncol 2008;19:1430-1434.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital-Associated Costs Due to Surgical Site Infection After Breast Surgery
Olsen et al.
Arch Surg 2008;143:53-60.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Increases Wound Complications: However, Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Is Not Delayed
Mortenson et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:988-991.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.