This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal

Keys to Diagnosis and Management

David H. Wisner, MD; Yong Chun; F. William Blaisdell, MD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(10):1319-1323.

Abstract
• Fifty-six patients with blunt intestinal injury seen during 39 months were reviewed for keys to diagnosis and treatment. Motor vehicle accidents were involved in 80% of the cases and seat/lap belts were in use 69% of the time. Blunt intestinal injury was the only abdominal injury in 70% of the cases. There were 42 perforations and 20 devascularizations; multiple injuries were common (27%). Abdominal tenderness was present on admission in 43 of 44 patients in whom a reliable examination was possible. Peritoneal lavage was positive in 13 (93%) of 14 patients. Computed tomography was falsely negative in three of four instances in which it was used. Perforations were most common in the upper and lower ends of the small bowel and in the sigmoid colon; devascularizations were most common in the distal ileum and sigmoid colon. Resection/anastomosis was performed in 38% of small-bowel perforations and in all small-bowel devascularizations. Resection/diversion was required in most colonic perforations (five of six patients) and devascularizations (four of six patients). There were five deaths (9%), none due to intestinal injury. There were seven complications related to intestinal injury. Diagnostic delay occurred in two patients; both had resultant morbidity. Blunt intestinal injury is associated with physical findings in conscious patients. Peritoneal lavage should be used when tenderness cannot be evaluated. Timely operative intervention minimizes morbidity and hospital stay.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:1319-1323)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication June 9, 1990.

Read before the 61st Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, Laguna Niguel, Calif, February 19, 1990.

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Medical Center, 4301 X St, Room 2310, Sacramento, CA 95817 (Dr Wisner).

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Surgically Important Bowel and/or Mesenteric Injury in Blunt Trauma: Accuracy of Multidetector CT for Evaluation
Atri et al.
Radiology 2008;249:524-533.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of Bowel and Mesenteric Blunt Trauma with Multidetector CT.
Brofman et al.
RadioGraphics 2006;26:1119-1131.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

{gamma}-Guided Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage for Detection of Bowel Perforation
Gulec et al.
Arch Surg 2004;139:1075-1078.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pathophysiology and management of bowel and mesenteric injuries due to blunt trauma
Abbasakoor and Vaizey
Trauma 2003;5:199-214.
ABSTRACT  

Defining the Role of Computed Tomography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma: Use in the Hemodynamically Stable Patient With a Depressed Level of Consciousness
Pal and Victorino
Arch Surg 2002;137:1029-1033.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

CT of Blunt Trauma Bowel and Mesenteric Injury: Typical Findings and Pitfalls in Diagnosis
Brody et al.
RadioGraphics 2000;20:1525-1536.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Blunt Intestinal Injury in Children: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Considerations
Kurkchubasche et al.
Arch Surg 1997;132:652-658.
ABSTRACT