You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 10, October 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 61ST ANNUAL MEETING OF THE PACIFIC COAST SURGICAL ASSOCIATION, LAGUNA NIGUEL, CALIF, FEBRUARY 18 TO FEBRUARY 21, 1990
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Selection Factors Resulting in Improved Survival After Surgical Resection of Tumors Metastatic to the Lungs

Francesco M. Marincola, MD; James B. D. Mark, MD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(10):1387-1393.


Abstract

• From 1973 through 1987, a total of 140 patients underwent 184 operations for removal of metastatic tumors to the lungs. The number of lesions removed ranged from one to 30. Of the patients, 44% had solitary lesions. Overall 3-year survival was 62.6%, and 5-year survival was 48.2%. In all primary tumors except melanoma and breast cancer, 3-year survival was greater than 50% and 5-year survival was greater than 40%. With rare exceptions, the operation of choice for unilateral lesions was ipsilateral thoracotomy, and for bilateral lesions it was median sternotomy. Adequate conservative resection was the rule. There were three pneumonectomies, 25 lobectomies, 71 single wedge resections, 38 multiple unilateral wedge resections, and 47 bilateral wedge resections. There were no postoperative hospital deaths. Cox covariate analysis demonstrated improved survival in patients whose largest lesion was less than 1.5 cm in diameter and with disease-free interval longer than 1 year, but survival was not related to number of lesions or age of patient. An aggressive surgical approach is justified in patients with most primary tumors and a limited number of lung metastases less than 1.5 cm in diameter. Resection of metastases from melanoma and breast cancer should be accomplished after other sites of metastatic disease have been ruled out by the most stringent criteria.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:1387-1393)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford (Calif) Medical Center.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication June 29, 1990.

Read before the 61st Annual Meeting of the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, Laguna Niguel, Calif, February 21, 1990.

Reprint requests to Stanford Medical Center, Room S283, Stanford, CA 94305 (Dr Mark).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Evaluation of Patients With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer?: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Gould et al.
Chest 2007;132:108S-130S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic Factors for Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Kuo et al.
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2007;14:992-997.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Surgical Management of Metastatic Melanoma
Allen and Coit
Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2002;9:762-770.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sequential thoracic metastasectomy prolongs survival by re-establishing local control within the chest
Jaklitsch et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2001;121:657-667.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resection of pulmonary metastases in six patients with disease-free interval greater than 10 years
Kamiyoshihara et al.
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1998;66:231-233.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

LONG-TERM RESULTS OF LUNG METASTASECTOMY: PROGNOSTIC ANALYSES BASED ON 5206 CASES
The International Registry of Lung Metastases et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1997;113:37-49.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.