You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 12, December 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE 14TH ANNUAL SURGICAL SYMPOSIUM OF THE ASSOCIATION OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SURGEONS, CHARLESTON, SC, MAY 7 TO 9, 1990
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (10)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effect of Intestinal Resection and Urogastrone on Intestinal Regeneration

Jon S. Thompson, MD; Larry E. Bragg, MD; Shailendra K. Saxena, MD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(12):1617-1621.


Abstract

• Intestinal regeneration in patched intestinal defects is enhanced by both intestinal resection and urogastrone. Our aim was to determine if these two stimuli have synergistic effects. Ileal defects were patched with colon serosa in 45 rabbits. Group 1 (n = 11) were control subjects; group 2 (n = 12) underwent 50% intestinal resection; group 3 (n=11) received urogastrone (1.5 µg/kg per hour subcutaneously); and group 4 (n = 11) underwent intestinal resection and received urogastrone. Animals were killed at 7 and 14 days. Intestinal resection had the greater effect on epithelialization. Urogastrone inhibited contraction and intestinal resection did not. Both intestinal resection and urogastrone increased proliferative activity. Combining intestinal resection and urogastrone did not have a synergistic effect on epithelialization and diminished the effect of urogastrone on proliferation and contraction. These findings suggest that intestinal resection and urogastrone stimulate epithelialization via similar mechanisms and that urogastrone would not enhance regeneration during intestinal adaptation.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:1617-1621)



Author Affiliations

From the Surgical Service, Omaha (Neb) Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Drs Thompson and Bragg); the Departments of Surgery (Drs Thompson and Bragg) and Anatomy (Dr Saxena), University of Nebraska, Omaha; and Creighton University School of Medicine (Dr Thompson).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 11, 1990.

Read before the 14th Annual Surgical Symposium of the Association of Veterans Affairs Surgeons, Charleston, SC, May 9, 1990.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 42nd and Dewey Ave, Omaha, NE 68105 (Dr Thompson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Epidermal Growth Factor and the Short Bowel Syndrome
Thompson
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1999;23:S113-S116.
ABSTRACT  

The effect of epidermal growth factor on brush border surface area and function in the distal remnant following resection in the rabbit
Hardin et al.
Gut 1999;44:26-32.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.