You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 3, March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  PAPERS READ BEFORE THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF, MAY 21 TO MAY 24, 1989-PAR T II
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (59)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Patterns of Failure in Anorectal Melanoma

A Guide to Surgical Therapy

Merrick Ross, MD; Christopher Pezzi, MD; Thomas Pezzi; Dennis Meurer, MD; Robert Hickey, MD; Charles Balch, MD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(3):313-316.


Abstract

•Anorectal melanoma is an aggressive tumor with a reported 5-year survival rate of 6%. Recommendations for local surgical therapy vary from local excision to abdominoperineal resection. Therapy, patterns of failure, and survival were retrospectively examined in 32 patients with anorectal melanoma. Twenty-six patients were treated surgically, 14 with abdominoperineal resection and 12 with local excision. Local recurrence occurred less frequently in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (4 [29%] of 14) compared with patients undergoing local excision (7 [58%] of 12) but developed concomitantly with distant or regional metastasis in all but 2 of the 11 patients whose operations failed locally. Inguinal nodal disease developed in 15 patients (47%). Pelvic nodal disease became apparent in only 2 patients (7%). There was no difference in overall survival between the two surgically treated groups (median survival, 19.5 months for patients treated with abdominoperineal resection vs 18.9 months for patients treated with local excision). Therefore, local excision is recommended when technically feasible since these patients eventually succumb to metastasis regardless of surgical therapy.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:313-316)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Surgery, the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication December 1, 1989.

Read before the annual meeting of the Society of Surgical Oncology, San Francisco, Calif, May 23, 1989.

Reprint requests to the Department of Surgery, the University of Texas, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030 (Dr Balch).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Sphincter-Sparing Local Excision and Adjuvant Radiation for Anal-Rectal Melanoma
Ballo et al.
JCO 2002;20:4555-4558.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.