You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 3, March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  CLINICAL NOTES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (60)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Retained Surgical Sponge Following Intra-abdominal Surgery

A Continuing Problem

William Rappaport, MD; Kevin Haynes, MD

Arch Surg. 1990;125(3):405-407.


Abstract



• The surgical sponge retained following intra-abdominal surgery is a continuing problem. Despite precautions, the incidence of this problem is grossly underestimated. During the past 10 years, we have treated four patients with this problem. The presentation of a retained surgical sponge is highly variable, as is the time before the onset of symptoms. The clinical presentation, predisposing factors, and management are presented as well as guidelines for prevention.

(Arch Surg. 1990;125:405-407)



Author Affiliations



From the Departments of Surgery (Dr Rappaport) and Gastroenterology (Dr Haynes), University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson.


Footnotes



Accepted for publication August 25, 1989.

Reprint requests to Department of Surgery, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, 1501N Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ 85724 (Dr Rappaport).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Retained surgical swabs in 13 dogs
Forster et al.
The Veterinary Record 2011;169:337-337.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Left Behind: Unintentionally Retained Surgically Placed Foreign Bodies and How to Reduce Their Incidence--Pictorial Review
Whang et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2009;193:S79-S89.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case 145: Retained Sponge
Kernagis et al.
Radiology 2009;251:608-611.
FULL TEXT  

Retained surgical swab following breast augmentation: a rare cause of a breast mass
Baruah et al.
BMJ Case Reports 2009;2009:bcr0720080519-bcr0720080519.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gossypiboma in Abdomen and Pelvis: MRI Findings in Four Patients
Kim et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;189:814-817.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Intrathoracic Gossypiboma
Madan et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;189:W90-W91.
FULL TEXT  

Medical Devices of the Abdomen and Pelvis
Hunter and Taljanovic
RadioGraphics 2005;25:503-523.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnostic Challenges in Patients With Tumors: CASE 1. GOSSYPIBOMA (FOREIGN BODY) MANIFESTING 30 YEARS AFTER LAPAROTOMY
Rajput et al.
JCO 2003;21:3700-3701.
FULL TEXT  

Foreign Bodies
Hunter and Taljanovic
RadioGraphics 2003;23:731-757.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Gossypiboma of the Abdomen
Moyle et al.
Arch Surg 1996;131:566-568.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.